D'zLEC_navigation

Sorimachi Speaks

21st Century Shape of Japan Series, No. 6

THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES: FROM COMPANY-FOCUSED TO INDIVIDUAL-FOCUSED

Q Due to dizzyingly rapid changes in the company environment and the digitization of the workplace, the human resources of workers are becoming outdated, and the constant acquisition of new skills is demanded. What sort of measures is the government announcing in response to this issue?
A Measures concerning the development of the human resources of workers are stated in the "Basic Policies for Macroeconomic Management and Structural Reform of the Japanese Economy," published on May 31, 2001 by the Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy, which is established in the Cabinet Office. For example, [1] in order to do away with mismatches and promote employment stability in the midst of increasing labor fluidity, it is necessary to support voluntary human resources development adapted to meet the needs of individual work and life plans in addition to company-sponsored resource development. [2] To this end, the paper promotes the building of in-company systems of career formation such as systems of resource development and flexible working hours, and suggests the need for establishment of the infrastructure of the labor market. Undertaking to meet these goals amounts to a conversion from the prior aid for company-focused vocational training toward support for individual-focused resource development.

Q What is the reason for this 180-degree turnaround in government policy?
A Presently, we are changing over from the era of material to the era of information and the era of knowledge. It is the arrival of the so-called knowledge-oriented society and information society. Intellectual creations brought forth by the human brain are becoming the core of a society's wealth. That Bill Gates of Microsoft Corporation became the richest man in the world is evidence of this. This fact bears witness to the fact that the core of our nation's wealth is changing from the "physical products" of heavy industry to the "intellectual-creation products" of intellectual-creation industries and specialized-knowledge service industries. Realizing that kind of change in the economic activity of our nation is the reason for this.

Q What, specifically, do individual-focused employment policies comprise?
A First there is the carrying out of policies toward the development and employment of the new growth fields that the government is currently promoting. The prior subsidies for in-company vocational training have to be revisited and changed to direct financial support to workers. The products of the new growth fields will have at their core services produced by the creative activity of the workers' brains. Thus, whether those services excel or not will depend on the intellectual level and level of specialization of the workers who perform those services. The organizational support of the company will do nothing more than provide basic preparation and have a secondary effect.
Second there is the change over from the prior company-focused economic policy to policy towards workers and individuals. This is the change of emphasis from the Ministry of Economy, Trade & Industry to the Ministry of Health, Labor & Welfare. One could call it a change "from capital to labor." This means not giving favorable treatment to investment and loans to companies but instead providing loans and scholarships for workers' vocational training and resource development. This also means the establishment of systems for the purpose of refining, specializing and advancing the working power and brains of workers, such as the introduction of paid leave, study and training systems and lifelong learning systems. These are already being implemented in Western countries.

Q Speaking of Western countries, in the United States, job hunters place advertisements in major newspapers and mass media describing the kind of work they are seeking. How would it be if this sort of personal advertisement spread in Japan as well?
A In the U.S., newspapers have long carried individuals' situation wanted advertisements. It seems that one can get a three-line advertisement for $25. In Japan, this would cost about 500,000 yen. Recently, it became possible to place situation wanted advertisements on Internet websites. However, there is no system in which tens and hundreds of such advertisements are gathered together in one site. In the U.S., such ads are placed on websites in which large numbers of job hunters gather.
The Ministry of Health, Labor & Welfare should provide support so that the web pages of large numbers of job hunters are gathered together. Because major newspapers are treated favorably by the resale price maintenance exemption system for copyrighted works, they should cooperate in this from the standpoint of the public interest.

Q It seems that there is something called a "career sheet" in order to prove the career experience of workers. What is this?
A When a lateral hire, as opposed to a new hire, is employed, a work history is usually submitted along with a resume. At present, job hunters draft these on their own, but not enough confidence can be placed in the reliability or objectivity such documents. Because one's future career development and self-development as a professional continue throughout one's life, it would be good to approximate something that could authenticate this career. Accordingly, this might mean steps such as the following: [1] in the case of studying or training at a private educational institution, the educational institution issues a certificate of completion of studies or academic transcript; [2] in the case of attending college, uniform national units are conferred; and [3] with respect to one's career within the company, career certificates are issued in which, to the extent possible, the human resources department states objectively the worker's actual work history. By means of such steps, workers would become able to move securely to another company or into another field.

Q The education and training benefit system and contract training business at private educational and training institutes are already operating under the government's employment measures, right? However, looking at recent unemployment rate figures, don't we need even more effective policies?
A That's right. Japan's worker-focused employment policies and human resources development policies have only just begun. The Koizumi Cabinet is resolutely carrying out "structural reform with nothing sacred." Accordingly, the establishment of an employment safety net is being hurried along. On this point, I think that in order to realize the expansion, reproduction and refinement of workers' working power, the reform of the tax system that propels this is absolutely necessary.
Recent economic policies have been ineffective because the tax system that supports them has not been revised. This is because the tax-system investigative commission of the ruling party and the government maintains, as ever, a company-focused tax system and a tax system that places great importance on "material," and has not changed to a system that treats individuals advantageously by supporting their original ideas and the expansion, reproduction and substantial improvement of workers' working power. This can be seen, for example, in the following: [1] investments are made with a focus on recipients of government loans and investments that are publicly-held companies; [2] consolidated tax payment is not employed even though holding companies are institutionalized; [3] a company or individual employer's vocational training and facilities are deemed necessary expenses, but a worker's vocational training and facilities purchased to procure the expansion, reproduction and refinement of his or her own working power are not allowed as necessary expenses for income tax purposes; [4] there exists no system of bank loans or scholarships for expenses to promote the intellectual abilities or intellectual improvement of individual workers (there are some marginal home loans); [5] although it is known that 60% or more of GTP comes from individual consumption, with respect to stock investments (which bring about individual consumption and investment) the tax law does not allow individuals to offset profits and losses or carry losses forward to the following year; [6] in contrast to the proportional tax rate on company profits regardless of the size of the company, the taxation of individuals is progressive; [7] companies do not have anything corresponding to the inheritance tax on individuals, the inheritance tax for individuals is as much as 70%, and the basis therefor is said to be the application of a punitive progressive tax to no more than 5% of taxpayers. The idea behind the taxation system applied to these individuals is based on the sense of labor valuation that continues to view workers as providers of physical labor. It is high time to scrap this notion. We need to create a culture that does not treat individuals who make efforts and those who succeed in the capitalist economy coldly, but that straightforwardly praises them.
The idea in Western countries is based on the principle that focuses on individualism and respects the original, creative activities of each individual. This idea is working advantageously in the advanced knowledge and information era of today. Japan has made a principle of collective cooperation, and formal equality has been respected under the principle of the nail that sticks up being pounded down. Now it is all the more indispensable that this idea be changed from the perspective of competing with Western countries.

What is called for is turnaround thinking: from the company to the individual, from capital to labor, from material to intelligence.

(Author: The form of question and answer was taken to clarify the issues.)


2001 issue of Legal Culture . (No.6; July)
index back next up

Copyright